Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Hayden, Michael ( 2004-03-11 )

… National Security Agency/Central Security Service Policy 1-23 (2004) … DOCID: 2805310 REF ID:A2450592 SECRETh'COMINTilXl NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE NSA/CSS POLICY 1-23 Issue Date: 11 March 2004 …

Wilkey, Malcom Richard (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 1982-11-05 )

… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …

Date Created

Date Issued