Search Full Text

… Defendant was not denied due process just because the district court conducted an ex parte, in camera review of FISA materials. See 827 F.2d at 476–77. View document: https://perma.cc/H5A5-TDEL … United States v. Ott, 827 …

… Denying defendant’s motion to “suppress evidence obtained or derived from surveillance conducted pursuant to Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.” 2016 WL 1029500, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, 11-CR-623 (JG), …

… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …

… The Court found that the materials provided to support an application under FISA met the probable cause standard under the Fourth Amendment. 864 F.32d at 1491. As the government met Fourth Amendment standard, the Court did …