Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Preska, Loretta A. (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2018-11-02 )

… Denying defendant’s “Motion to Suppress and for Disclosure of FISA Materials.” 2018 WL 5777025, at *1. … United States v. Chi Ping Ho, 17 Cr. 779 (LAP), 2018 WL 5777025 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2018). … ltmJCSDNY • , . 1 DOCUMENT …

Gibson, John R. (United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1991-01-10 )

… The Court found the “district court did not err in concluding probable cause existed to believe [defendant] was agent of a foreign power and that each of the places where the electronic surveillance was conducted was being …

Date Created

Date Issued