Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 5 of 5

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Norris, William Albert (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1987-09-03 )

… Defendant was not denied due process just because the district court conducted an ex parte, in camera review of FISA materials. See 827 F.2d at 476–77. View document: https://perma.cc/H5A5-TDEL … United States v. Ott, 827 …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Norris, William Albert (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1989-01-09 )

… The Court found that the materials provided to support an application under FISA met the probable cause standard under the Fourth Amendment. 864 F.32d at 1491. As the government met Fourth Amendment standard, the Court did …

Garland, Merrick B. ( 2022-10-07 )

… Department of Justice, 28 CFR 201 … Billing Code: 4410-PF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of the Attorney General 28 CFR Part 201 Docket No. NSD 103; Attorney General Order No. 5517-2022 RIN 1105-AB68 Data Protection Review …

Date Created

Date Issued