Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 9 of 9

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule Page Title I. Applicability of Rules. 1. Scope of Rules …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … ,M YRftl~ ltltll FM19n lntelllgence IUMHllna Court of Review MAY 03 2018 UNITED STATES ~~Hal. ClelkaOourt FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW WASHINGTON, D.C. ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( 2016-04-14 )

… In re Certified Question of Law, 858 F.3d 591 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2016) (per curiam). … Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( 2018-03-16 )

… In re: Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, No. FISCR 18-01, 2018 WL 2709456 (FISA Ct. Rev. Mar. 16, 2018). (per curiam) … Flied Unlttcl ltatt1 Foreign lntetllgln• …

Walker, Vaughn R. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2007-01-18 )

… Finding that “FISA does not completely preempt plaintiffs' state law claims.” 483 F. Supp. 2d at 940. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12836154213984084203&q=483… … In re NSA Telecomm. Records …

Walker, Vaughn R. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2008-07-02 )

… “FISA preempts or displaces the state secrets privilege” in this case. 564 F. Supp. 2d. at 1124. “To proceed with their FISA claim, plaintiffs must present to the court enough specifics based on non-classified evidence to …

Walker, Vaughn R. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2009-01-05 )

… Finding that “plaintiffs [] alleged enough to plead “aggrieved person” status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings under [FISA].” 595 F. Supp. 2d at 1086. View document: …

Walker, Vaughn R. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2009-06-03 )

… Finding that “section 803 [of the FISA Amendments Act] does not violate the Tenth Amendment.” 630 F. Supp. 2d at 1102. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2074081794773837532&q=630+… … In re NSA …

Flanagan, Louise W. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, 2011-06-22 )

… “While defendants correctly point out that FISA provides for a different probable cause standard than Title III, the difference is not unconstitutional.” 793 F. Supp. 2d at 759. “FISA materials will not be disclosed.” Id. …

Date Created

Date Issued