Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Ericksen, Joan N. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2004-09-30 )

… Granting the DOJ and the FBI’s motion “that they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings on [defendant’s] FISA claim because they are not ‘persons’ against whom FISA's civil liability provision provides a cause of …

Owsley, Brian L. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 2012-07-23 )

… Dismissing plaintiff’s claims based on violations of FISA. See 2012 WL 3257801, at *5. … Adams v. DOJ, No. MC–12–305, 2012 WL 3257801 (S.D. Tex. July 23, 2012). … IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued