Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 7 of 7

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule Page Title I. Applicability of Rules. 1. Scope of Rules …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … ,M YRftl~ ltltll FM19n lntelllgence IUMHllna Court of Review MAY 03 2018 UNITED STATES ~~Hal. ClelkaOourt FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW WASHINGTON, D.C. ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( 2016-04-14 )

… In re Certified Question of Law, 858 F.3d 591 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2016) (per curiam). … Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ( 2018-03-16 )

… In re: Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, No. FISCR 18-01, 2018 WL 2709456 (FISA Ct. Rev. Mar. 16, 2018). (per curiam) … Flied Unlttcl ltatt1 Foreign lntetllgln• …

Ericksen, Joan N. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2004-09-30 )

… Granting the DOJ and the FBI’s motion “that they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings on [defendant’s] FISA claim because they are not ‘persons’ against whom FISA's civil liability provision provides a cause of …

Leinenweber, Harry D. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 2010-11-10 )

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

Leinenweber, Harry D. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 2012-08-30 )

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …

Date Created

Date Issued