Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Edmunds, Nancy G. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 2020-12-24 )

… After given notice that information obtained or derived via FISA would be offered into evidence, the defendant filed motions for discovery and suppression of the materials (pursuant to §§ 1806(e) and 1825(f)) and dismissal …

Garland, Merrick B. ( 2022-10-07 )

… Department of Justice, 28 CFR 201 … Billing Code: 4410-PF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of the Attorney General 28 CFR Part 201 Docket No. NSD 103; Attorney General Order No. 5517-2022 RIN 1105-AB68 Data Protection Review …

Date Created

Date Issued