Search Full Text

… “Because the FISA surveillance was not illegal, this Court need not consider the parties' arguments as to whether the illegality of FISA surveillance may serve as a defense to contempt in a grand jury proceeding.” 347 F.3d …

… Rejecting defendant’s argument that “evidence gathered under FISA cannot be used in domestic criminal investigations or prosecutions.” 477 F.3d at 897. Because “FISA requires each intercept to be authorized by a warrant,” …

… The Court, following its own precent in Ott, 827 F.2d 473, stated the government met the requirement that the “purpose of the surveillance must be to secure foreign intelligence surveillance.” 841 F.2d at 964. The Court …