Search Full Text

… Defendant’s “sixth amendment rights were not violated by counsel's inability to discuss the FISA materials.” 2010 WL 5776532, at *3. … United States v. Jamal, Nos. CIV 09–0332–PHX–FJM (DKD), CR 03–0261–1–PHX–FJM, 2010 WL …

… Denying defendant’s “Motion to Disclose FISA–Related Material Necessary to Litigate Motions for Discovery and for Suppression of the Fruits of FISA Activity.” 2012 WL 12952303, at *7. … United States v. Mohamud, No. …

… Denying defendants’ “defendants' Motion for Discovery of Classified Materials [97], Motion to Declare Unconstitutional the Classified Information Procedures Act & Motion to Compel Disclosure of Classified Discovery [109], …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Full Discovery Regarding the Facts and Circumstances Underlying Surveillance and Motion to Compel Immediate Production to the Court of Classified Documents Related to Pending Posttrial …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Vacation of Conviction and Alternative Remedies of Dismissal of the Indictment, Suppression of Evidence, and New Trial for the Government's Violation of the Pretrial Notice Statute [500], …

… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …