Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 10 of 10

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the application of the United States to conduct electronic surveillance. … Order Authorizing Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00168 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … FBI …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Redacted order directing the government to appear at a hearing to provide the court with further information for consideration to authorize an extension of the existing surveillance. … Order, [REDACTED], …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Setting out the Court’s reasons for adding clarification for its jurisdiction and scope of its authorization into the surveillance order language. Order granting the application of the United States to …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Order permitting the continued authorization of electronic surveillance of [Redacted] till the next hearing. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00253 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … All withheld …

Lynch, Gerard E. (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2014-05-07 )

… Judicial review of telephone metadata program is not precluded by FISA. See 785 F. 3d at 805. Telephone metadata program was not authorized by text of section 215. Id. at 821. View document: …

Davis, Michael J. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2012-01-18 )

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Davis, Michael J. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2012-06-20 )

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Lynch, Gerard E. (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2019-12-18 )

… Holding that: 1) “‘incidental collection’ of communications (that is, the collection of the communications of individuals in the United States acquired in the course of the surveillance of individuals without ties to the …

Date Created

Date Issued