Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the application of the United States to conduct electronic surveillance. … Order Authorizing Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00168 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … FBI …

… Date Redacted … Redacted order directing the government to appear at a hearing to provide the court with further information for consideration to authorize an extension of the existing surveillance. … Order, [REDACTED], …

… Date Redacted … Setting out the Court’s reasons for adding clarification for its jurisdiction and scope of its authorization into the surveillance order language. Order granting the application of the United States to …

… Date Redacted … Order permitting the continued authorization of electronic surveillance of [Redacted] till the next hearing. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00253 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … All withheld …

… Found “no abuse of discretion by the district court's refusal to order disclosure of the FISA applications and other material pursuant to § 1806(f).” 664 F.3d at 567. Found “no due process violation” when FISA materials …

… Finding that “FISA does not completely preempt plaintiffs' state law claims.” 483 F. Supp. 2d at 940. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12836154213984084203&q=483… … In re NSA Telecomm. Records …

… “FISA preempts or displaces the state secrets privilege” in this case. 564 F. Supp. 2d. at 1124. “To proceed with their FISA claim, plaintiffs must present to the court enough specifics based on non-classified evidence to …

… Finding that “plaintiffs [] alleged enough to plead “aggrieved person” status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings under [FISA].” 595 F. Supp. 2d at 1086. View document: …

… Finding that “section 803 [of the FISA Amendments Act] does not violate the Tenth Amendment.” 630 F. Supp. 2d at 1102. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2074081794773837532&q=630+… … In re NSA …

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …