Search Full Text

… “The government has strictly complied with the requirements of FISA in its investigation and prosecution of this case. The court concludes that there is no basis to disclose or to suppress the FISA materials.” 228 F. Supp. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… National Security Council Intelligence Directive (NSCID) No.6 (1972) … NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 12 JUNE 2015 TOP SECRET- NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTIVE NO. 61 SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE (Effective 17 February …