Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 9 of 9

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the application of the United States to conduct electronic surveillance. … Order Authorizing Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00168 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … FBI …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Redacted order directing the government to appear at a hearing to provide the court with further information for consideration to authorize an extension of the existing surveillance. … Order, [REDACTED], …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Setting out the Court’s reasons for adding clarification for its jurisdiction and scope of its authorization into the surveillance order language. Order granting the application of the United States to …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Order permitting the continued authorization of electronic surveillance of [Redacted] till the next hearing. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00253 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … All withheld …

Davis, Michael J. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2012-01-18 )

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

Conner, Christopher C. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, 2017-01-12 )

… “The government has strictly complied with the requirements of FISA in its investigation and prosecution of this case. The court concludes that there is no basis to disclose or to suppress the FISA materials.” 228 F. Supp. …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Davis, Michael J. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2012-06-20 )

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued