Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… “FISA surveillance of [defendants] was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 952 F.2d at 572. View document: https://perma.cc/9L2J-EQZZ … United States v. Johnson, 952 F.2d 565 (1st Cir. 1991). … US v. Johnson, 952 F. 2d 565 …

… View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14625398451423247357&q=930… … In re Nat’l Sec. Letter, 930 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (N.D. Cal. 2013) … In re Nat'l Sec. …