Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order granting government the authority to conduct search. Basic Fourth Amendment requirements are satisfied in "places to be search" and "things to be seized". … Order, [REDACTED], No. …

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order authorizing unspecified electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information, including incidental acquisition of other foreign intelligence information. … Order …

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing installation and use of pen register and/or trap and trace devices pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 50 U.S.C. §§1801-1811, §§1841-1846. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00137 (FISA Ct.) …

… Date Redacted … Order granting the government’s motion to file a supplemental brief to include issues of statutory interpretation under the FISA and constitutional analysis under the Fourth Amendment. … Order for …

… Date Redacted … Order granting the government’s motion to file a supplemental brief to include issues of statutory interpretation under the FISA and constitutional analysis under the Fourth Amendment. … Order for …

… Date Redacted … Order requiring the government to submit a preliminary statement in support of [Redacted] in the event that questions regarding [Redacted] appear thereafter. … [Order], [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], …

… Date Redacted … Order granting the government to conduct physical search and obtain foreign intelligence information, provided that FBI should follow the standard physical search minimization procedures and particularized …

… Denying disclosure of FISA-related materials. See 531 F. Supp. 2d at 838–39. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=971601617375688086&q=531+F… … United States v. Amawi, 531 F. Supp. 2d 832 (N.D. Ohio …

… “The government has strictly complied with the requirements of FISA in its investigation and prosecution of this case. The court concludes that there is no basis to disclose or to suppress the FISA materials.” 228 F. Supp. …

… The Court found the “district court did not err in concluding probable cause existed to believe [defendant] was agent of a foreign power and that each of the places where the electronic surveillance was conducted was being …