Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 5 of 5

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Carney, Cormac J. (United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2006-11-20 )

… Denying defendant’s motion “to compel production of the FISA applications, orders, and related material” and “suppression of all information obtained from the FISA surveillance.” 2006 WL 8436820, at *1. … United States v. …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

McFadden, Trevor N. (United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 2018-05-22 )

… The Court held that the FBI properly redacted four pages of its FISA and Standard Minimization Procedures Guide under FOIA Exemption 1 and 3. 2018 WL 2324084, at *6. … Elec. Privacy Info Ctr. v. FBI, No. 17-cv-00121, 2018 …

McFadden, Trevor N. ( 2020-07-24 )

… FOIA request for USP unmasking requests. Court held (1) statements made by officials after leaving office do not constitute “official disclosures” necessary to overcome Glomar; (2) Grennell memo naming UN Ambassador …

Date Created

Date Issued