Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule Page Title I. Applicability of Rules. 1. Scope of Rules …

… Date Redacted … ,M YRftl~ ltltll FM19n lntelllgence IUMHllna Court of Review MAY 03 2018 UNITED STATES ~~Hal. ClelkaOourt FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW WASHINGTON, D.C. ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF …

… In re Certified Question of Law, 858 F.3d 591 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2016) (per curiam). … Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI …

… In re: Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, No. FISCR 18-01, 2018 WL 2709456 (FISA Ct. Rev. Mar. 16, 2018). (per curiam) … Flied Unlttcl ltatt1 Foreign lntetllgln• …

… Denying defendant’s motion that judge recuse himself because judge was “a member of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (‘FISA Court’).” 955 F. Supp. at 583. View document: …

… “FISA Satisfies the Requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” 955 F. Supp. at 590. “FISA Violates neither the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment nor the Right to Counsel Provided by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. at 592. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress all evidence derived from any searches and surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 437 F. Supp. 2d at 555. View document: …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …