Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s motion that judge recuse himself because judge was “a member of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (‘FISA Court’).” 955 F. Supp. at 583. View document: …

… “FISA Satisfies the Requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” 955 F. Supp. at 590. “FISA Violates neither the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment nor the Right to Counsel Provided by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. at 592. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress all evidence derived from any searches and surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 437 F. Supp. 2d at 555. View document: …

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

… Company filed FOIA suit seeking all communications intercepted by NSA as intelligence information or via bulk collection. The Court found that the NSA properly withheld information pursuant to a Glomar response. View …