Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order and warrant authorizing unspecified electronic surveillance. Secondary order to persons whose assistance is necessary in order to implement the authorities approved herein. … Primary …

… Date Redacted … Government application requesting authorization for electronic surveillance and physical search. Court’s conclusion is redacted. … Memorandum Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00139 (FISA Ct.) …

… Supplemental order requiring the NSA to submit in designated reports a discussion of NSA consideration and implementation of purging credit card information produced by [redacted]. … Supplemental Order, In re Application …

… Primary order granting application pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 1861 of call detail records or "telephony metadata" created by [redacted]. … Primary Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order …

… Denying defendant’s motion that judge recuse himself because judge was “a member of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (‘FISA Court’).” 955 F. Supp. at 583. View document: …

… “FISA Satisfies the Requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” 955 F. Supp. at 590. “FISA Violates neither the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment nor the Right to Counsel Provided by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. at 592. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress all evidence derived from any searches and surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 437 F. Supp. 2d at 555. View document: …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …