Search Full Text

… Order amending Rule 15(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review changing the requirements and format of amicus curiae submitted to the court. … Order, Order …

… Granting motion from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press for leave to file an additional brief as amicus curiae in support of movants. … Order, In re Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign …

… Directing parties to the proceeding to file supplemental briefs, and appointing Professor Laura Donohue to serve as amicus curiae. … Order, In re Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance …

… Finding that “FISA preempts the common law doctrine of the state secrets privilege.” 965 F. Supp. 2d at 1105. Also finding that defendants did not “[waive] sovereign immunity to sue for damages.” See id. at 1106–07. View …

… Granting Government motion for summary judgment in FOIA suit, denying plaintiffs information about notice of FISA surveillance/definition of “derived from.” On grounds they are covered by attorney-client privilege. … ACLU …

… Granting Government motion for summary judgment in FOIA suit, denying plaintiffs information about notice of FISA surveillance/definition of “derived from.” On grounds they are covered by attorney-client privilege. … ACLU …

… DoDD 5240.01, DoD Intelligence Activities (2007) … Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5240.01 August 27, 2007 Incorporating Change 3, Effective November 9, 2020 USD(I&S) SUBJECT: DoD Intelligence Activities References: …

… Dept' of Def. 5205.12 Military Intelligence Program (MIP) (2008) … Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5205.12 November 14, 2008 Incorporating Change 2, Effective October 1, 2020 USD(I&S) SUBJECT: Military Intelligence …

… Dep't of Def. Directive S-5200.37, "Management and Execution of Defense Human Intelligence (HUMINT)" … Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER S-5200.37 February 9, 2009 USD()) SUBJECT: Management and Execution of Defense …

… The Court, after extensive in camera review of the classified materials and public evidence, “finds that making any particularized determination on standing in order to continue the litigation may imperil the national …