Search Full Text

… Finding that “[d]isclosure of the contents of the FISA material would harm the national security because it would reveal the capabilities and techniques of surveillance, the sources and methods used to counter …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… U.S. Signals Intelligence Directive (USSID) SP0018, legal Compliance and Minimization Procedures (1993) … ......_.. ~. ..; .-- :- NATIONAL SECURI.T Y AGENEY . CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE . Fort George G. Meade, Maryland-> .• …