Search Full Text

… Finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations do not establish Defendants willfully violated the use and disclosure provisions for information gathered from surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 142 F. Supp. 3d at 1170. …

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of FISA Applications and Orders and denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress FISA-derived Evidence. 2010 WL 1641167, at *7. … United States v. Nicholson, No. 09-CR-40-BR, 2010 WL …

… Denying defendant’s “motion for new trial based upon the alleged violation of FISA and CIPA.” 2013 WL 6079518, at *9. … United States v. Moalin, No. 10cr4246 JM, 2013 WL 6079518 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2013). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …

… Denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the FISA Wiretap. 2014 WL 1682845, at *1. … United States v. Hussein, No. 13CR1514–JM, 2014 WL 1682845 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2014). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …