Search Full Text

… Finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations do not establish Defendants willfully violated the use and disclosure provisions for information gathered from surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 142 F. Supp. 3d at 1170. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of FISA Applications and Orders and denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress FISA-derived Evidence. 2010 WL 1641167, at *7. … United States v. Nicholson, No. 09-CR-40-BR, 2010 WL …

… “DOJ has established a proper basis for withholding, in full, the FISC orders and opinions at issue, and for withholding all names of telecommunications providers participating in the Call Records Collection Program, under …