Search Full Text

… Finding that “the district court did not err in denying Mohamud's motion to suppress premised on the late supplemental FISA notice” because defendant couldn’t “demonstrate how the late disclosure prejudiced him.” 843 F.3d …

… “While defendants correctly point out that FISA provides for a different probable cause standard than Title III, the difference is not unconstitutional.” 793 F. Supp. 2d at 759. “FISA materials will not be disclosed.” Id. …

… Finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations do not establish Defendants willfully violated the use and disclosure provisions for information gathered from surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 142 F. Supp. 3d at 1170. …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of FISA Applications and Orders and denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress FISA-derived Evidence. 2010 WL 1641167, at *7. … United States v. Nicholson, No. 09-CR-40-BR, 2010 WL …