Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the application of the United States to conduct electronic surveillance. … Order Authorizing Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00168 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … FBI …

… Date Redacted … Redacted order directing the government to appear at a hearing to provide the court with further information for consideration to authorize an extension of the existing surveillance. … Order, [REDACTED], …

… Date Redacted … Setting out the Court’s reasons for adding clarification for its jurisdiction and scope of its authorization into the surveillance order language. Order granting the application of the United States to …

… Date Redacted … Order permitting the continued authorization of electronic surveillance of [Redacted] till the next hearing. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00253 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … All withheld …

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

… Finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations do not establish Defendants willfully violated the use and disclosure provisions for information gathered from surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 142 F. Supp. 3d at 1170. …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of FISA Applications and Orders and denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress FISA-derived Evidence. 2010 WL 1641167, at *7. … United States v. Nicholson, No. 09-CR-40-BR, 2010 WL …

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …