Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 9 of 9

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order authorizing electronic surveillance and physical search to acquire foreign intelligence information, including incidental acquisition of other foreign intelligence information. … …

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order and warrant authorizing unspecified electronic surveillance and physical search. … Primary Order and Warrant, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00169 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … FBI …

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Supplemental order directing the government to make a supplemental submission (redacted). … Supplemental Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00147 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information …

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … [Labeled as an opinion but almost entirely redacted] … Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00146 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information exempt under b(1), b(3) and b(7)(E) except as …

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2007-02-07 )

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2007-12-14 )

… Begins on FSC 074 … Order authorizing Yahoo! to file a sur-reply brief solely on the issue of standing. … Authorization for Sur-Reply, In re Directives to Yahoo! Inc. Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence …

Tunheim, John R. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2008-04-17 )

… “The fact that the government has included misstatements and critical omissions in other FISA applications not at issue here cannot justify disclosure in this case. Without some indication that the congressionally mandated …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued