Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order authorizing electronic surveillance and physical search to acquire foreign intelligence information, including incidental acquisition of other foreign intelligence information. … …

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order and warrant authorizing unspecified electronic surveillance and physical search. … Primary Order and Warrant, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00169 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … FBI …

… Date Redacted … Supplemental order directing the government to make a supplemental submission (redacted). … Supplemental Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00147 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information …

… President's Review Grp. on Intelligence and Commc’ns Techs., Liberty and Security in a Changing World: Report and Recommendations of The President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies (Dec. 12, …

… Date Redacted … [Labeled as an opinion but almost entirely redacted] … Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00146 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information exempt under b(1), b(3) and b(7)(E) except as …

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Begins on FSC 074 … Order authorizing Yahoo! to file a sur-reply brief solely on the issue of standing. … Authorization for Sur-Reply, In re Directives to Yahoo! Inc. Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence …

… Finding that “plaintiffs have failed to show an injury that could be redressed by the injunctive relief they request.” 280 F. Supp. 3d at 54 (“plaintiffs seek three distinct forms of declaratory and injunctive relief: (1) …

… EFF brought suit after DOJ denied FOIA request for an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) Opinion memorandum. 892 F. Supp. 2d at 96-97. The Court found that the material was properly withheld under Exemption 1 (national …

… The Court found that subscribers had a substantial likelihood of success in claiming their Fourth Amendments rights were violated by the NSA’s bulk telephony metadata program. 957 F. Supp. 2d at 25-42. View document: …