Search Full Text

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

… Dismissing defendant’s Fourth Amendment and FISA claims for “failure to state a claim.” 2010 WL 4724279, at *7. … Ciralsky v. CIA, No. 1:10cv911 (LMB/JFA), 2010 WL 4724279 (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2010). … IN THE UNITED STATES …

… Dismissing suit alleging violation of constitutional, statutory, and common law rights by unauthorized electronic surveillance of plaintiffs’ home and electronic devices. … Attkisson v. Holder, No. 17-cv-364 (LMB/JFA), …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

… Denying defendant’s motion for Disclosure of FISA Applications. 2019 WL 1186846, at *6. … United States v. Kokayi, 1:18-cr-410 (LMB), 2019 WL 1186846 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2019). … Case 1:18-cr-00410-LMB Document 67 Filed …

… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …