Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Bissoon, Cathy, (United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 2019-02-04 )

… The Court granted the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. 2019 WL 426482, at *1. The government has shown by preponderance that it did not engage in dragnet-type activity through the PRISM program. Id. …

Forrest, Katherine Bolan (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2016-08-25 )

… Action was brought against the NSA challenging three redactions based in two reports relating to the PR/TT program. Id. at 376. The NSA declaration indicated that FOIA Exemption 1 applied to these redactions because …

Date Created

Date Issued