Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the application of the United States to conduct electronic surveillance. … Order Authorizing Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00168 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … FBI …

… Date Redacted … Redacted order directing the government to appear at a hearing to provide the court with further information for consideration to authorize an extension of the existing surveillance. … Order, [REDACTED], …

… Date Redacted … Setting out the Court’s reasons for adding clarification for its jurisdiction and scope of its authorization into the surveillance order language. Order granting the application of the United States to …

… Date Redacted … Order permitting the continued authorization of electronic surveillance of [Redacted] till the next hearing. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00253 (FISA Ct.) (Davis, J.) … All withheld …

… Agent defendants are “entitled to qualified immunity with respect to this category of surveillance.” 916 F.3d at 1220. Agent defendants not entitled to qualified immunity “for recordings made by devices planted by FBI …

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

… ICD 304, Human Intelligence, (March 6, 2008) (Amended July 9, 2009). … ICD 304 UNCLASSIFIED/FOWQ INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 304 =e me | tata 2 \t\ a\* HUMAN INTELLIGENCE A. (U) PURPOSE 1. (U) Pursuant to …

… Holding that that the Government may have violated the Fourth Amendment and did violate FISA when it collected the telephony metadata of millions of Americans, including at least one of the defendants convicted of sending …

… The Court amended the opinion reported at 916 F.3d 1202, unanimously voting to deny a petition for rehearing. The Court also voted on an en banc rehearing, but the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes by …