Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 5 of 5

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Beller, Sarah ( 2022-01-01 )

… Sarah Beller, 401-Forbidden: An Empirical Study of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Notices, 1990-2020, 13 Harv. Nat'l Sec. J. 158 (2022). [Westlaw] [Lexis] … 401-Forbidden: An Empirical Study of Foreign Intelligence …

Jackson, Amy Berman (United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 2014-07-18 )

… EFF requested disclosure of further redactions of GID.C.00073. The Court held that the released document was properly redacted under FOIA exemption protecting records classified pursuant to executive order. View document: …

Jackson, Amy Berman (United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 2020-01-28 )

… Plaintiff submitted a four-part FOIA request to six intelligence agencies requesting procedures the agencies must follow in regard to unmasking and upstreaming. The agencies each provided Glomar responses for parts 2 and 3 …

Date Created

Date Issued