Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Kravitz, Mark R. (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, 2008-01-24 )

… Denying “defendant’s motion to suppress, motion for disclosure of FISA applications and orders.” 531 F. Supp. 2d at 313. “FISA, as amended . . . is constitutional under the 4th amendment.” Id. “FISA surveillance in this …

Baylson, Michael M. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 2016-08-18 )

… Rejecting “Defendant's apparent contention that FISA's ex parte provisions are per se unlawful.” 201 F. Supp. 3d at 650. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12233383397783409140&q=201… … United …

Norris, William Albert (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1987-09-03 )

… Defendant was not denied due process just because the district court conducted an ex parte, in camera review of FISA materials. See 827 F.2d at 476–77. View document: https://perma.cc/H5A5-TDEL … United States v. Ott, 827 …

Norris, William Albert (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1989-01-09 )

… The Court found that the materials provided to support an application under FISA met the probable cause standard under the Fourth Amendment. 864 F.32d at 1491. As the government met Fourth Amendment standard, the Court did …

Date Created

Date Issued