Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the government installation and use of pen register and trap and trace devices, with no geographic limits or restrictions within the United States. … Order, [REDACTED], No. REDACTED, …

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order and warrant authorizing unspecified electronic surveillance. Coverage and scope of each authorities are set forth in each of the techniques identified (redacted). … Order and Warrant, …

… Directing the government to destroy information obtained by unauthorized electronic surveillance. … Opinion and Order Requiring Destruction of Information Obtained by Unauthorized Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], Nos. …

… Ordering the government to submit further information regarding its proposed retention and use of the results of unauthorized surveillance. … Opinion and Order Regarding Fruits of Unauthorized Electronic Surveillance, …

… Denying in part and granting in part the government’s Motion for Reconsideration; [procedural history almost entirely redacted]; holding that the practices at issue are not moot thus presenting the court with a live issue; …

… Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Finding that “FISA does not completely preempt plaintiffs' state law claims.” 483 F. Supp. 2d at 940. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12836154213984084203&q=483… … In re NSA Telecomm. Records …

… “FISA preempts or displaces the state secrets privilege” in this case. 564 F. Supp. 2d. at 1124. “To proceed with their FISA claim, plaintiffs must present to the court enough specifics based on non-classified evidence to …

… Finding that “plaintiffs [] alleged enough to plead “aggrieved person” status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings under [FISA].” 595 F. Supp. 2d at 1086. View document: …

… Finding that “section 803 [of the FISA Amendments Act] does not violate the Tenth Amendment.” 630 F. Supp. 2d at 1102. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2074081794773837532&q=630+… … In re NSA …