Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 7 of 7

Gorton, Nathaniel M. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the pen register and/or trap and trace surveillance. … Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00156 (FISA Ct.) (Gorton, J.) … b6 b7C UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT …

Gorton, Nathaniel M. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Granting the government's motion for authority to retain the results of Court-Authorized Pen Register and/or Trap and Trace Surveillance. … Opinion and Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00155 (FISA …

Ashcroft, John ( 2003-10-31 )

… John Ashcroft, The Attorney General’s Guidelines for FBI National Security Investigations and Foreign Intelligence Collection (Oct. 31, 2003) … THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S GUIDELINES FOR FBI NATIONAL SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS AND …

Gorton, Nathaniel M. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2001-07-25 )

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

Gorton, Nathaniel M. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2007-05-03 )

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

Moschella, William ( 2002-09-23 )

,

Ashcroft, John ( 2002-09-23 )

… Pending issuance of final procedures: “Guidelines for Disclosure of Grand Jury and Electronic, Wire, and Oral Interception Information Identifying United States Persons” (September 23, 2002) … 49 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:36 …

Wilkey, Malcom Richard (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 1982-11-05 )

… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …

Date Created

Date Issued