Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s “motion for disclosure of the FISA material.” 752 F. Supp. at 83. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9299616249076984240&q=752+… … United States v. Thomson, 752 F. Supp. 75 …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… Defendant was not denied due process just because the district court conducted an ex parte, in camera review of FISA materials. See 827 F.2d at 476–77. View document: https://perma.cc/H5A5-TDEL … United States v. Ott, 827 …

… The Court found that the materials provided to support an application under FISA met the probable cause standard under the Fourth Amendment. 864 F.32d at 1491. As the government met Fourth Amendment standard, the Court did …