Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Pfaelzer, Mariana R. (United States District Court for the Central District of California, 1985-01-24 )

… “FISA is constitutional both on its face and in its application to this case.” 1985 WL 5970, at *2. FISA survives defendant’s Fourth Amendment challenge. Id. … United States v. Hovsepian, No. CR 82–917 MRP, 1985 WL 5970 …

Alito, Samuel A., Jr. (United States Supreme Court, 2013-02-26 )

… Plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge FISA provision because alleged injuries were not certainly impending and not fairly traceable to the provision. See 568 U.S. at 410–11. View document: - …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued