Search Full Text

… The court agreed with the district court’s conclusion “that [the defendant] ‘continue[s] to suffer a present, on-going injury due to the government's continued retention of derivative material from the FISA seizure.’” 599 …

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

… Plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge FISA provision because alleged injuries were not certainly impending and not fairly traceable to the provision. See 568 U.S. at 410–11. View document: - …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …