Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Helmick, Jeffrey J. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, 2018-09-11 )

… Denying defendant’s request for disclosure of FISA material. 339 F. Supp. 3d at 737. Defendants are “not entitled to suppression of evidence obtained or derived from surveillance and physical searches conducted under FISA …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Alito, Samuel A., Jr. (United States Supreme Court, 2013-02-26 )

… Plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge FISA provision because alleged injuries were not certainly impending and not fairly traceable to the provision. See 568 U.S. at 410–11. View document: - …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued