Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Flanagan, Louise W. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, 2011-06-22 )

… “While defendants correctly point out that FISA provides for a different probable cause standard than Title III, the difference is not unconstitutional.” 793 F. Supp. 2d at 759. “FISA materials will not be disclosed.” Id. …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Alito, Samuel A., Jr. (United States Supreme Court, 2013-02-26 )

… Plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge FISA provision because alleged injuries were not certainly impending and not fairly traceable to the provision. See 568 U.S. at 410–11. View document: - …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued