Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 7 of 7

Administration of Barack Obama ( 2014-01-01 )

… Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-28:Signals Intelligence Activities, 2014 Daily Comp. Pres. Doc. 31 (Jan. 17, 2014) … Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Directive on Signals Intelligence Activities January 17, 2014 …

Cacheris, James C. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1997-02-03 )

… Denying defendant’s motion that judge recuse himself because judge was “a member of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (‘FISA Court’).” 955 F. Supp. at 583. View document: …

Cacheris, James C. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1997-02-14 )

… “FISA Satisfies the Requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” 955 F. Supp. at 590. “FISA Violates neither the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment nor the Right to Counsel Provided by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. at 592. …

Cacheris, James C. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 2006-05-17 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress all evidence derived from any searches and surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 437 F. Supp. 2d at 555. View document: …

Koeltl, John G. (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2002-08-12 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

Koeltl, John G. (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2003-09-15 )

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

Koeltl, John G. (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2003-11-05 )

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

Date Created

Date Issued