Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order authorizing electronic surveillance and physical search to acquire foreign intelligence information, including incidental acquisition of other foreign intelligence information. … …

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted order and warrant authorizing unspecified electronic surveillance and physical search. … Primary Order and Warrant, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00169 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … FBI …

… Date Redacted … Supplemental order directing the government to make a supplemental submission (redacted). … Supplemental Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00147 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information …

… Date Redacted … [Labeled as an opinion but almost entirely redacted] … Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00146 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information exempt under b(1), b(3) and b(7)(E) except as …

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Begins on FSC 074 … Order authorizing Yahoo! to file a sur-reply brief solely on the issue of standing. … Authorization for Sur-Reply, In re Directives to Yahoo! Inc. Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence …

… Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-28:Signals Intelligence Activities, 2014 Daily Comp. Pres. Doc. 31 (Jan. 17, 2014) … Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Directive on Signals Intelligence Activities January 17, 2014 …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …